一本道

Photo of Johannes Matschewsky

Johannes Matschewsky

Associate Professor, Head of Unit

Can manufacturing create the products we need and the wellbeing we value, while operating within planetary boundaries? In my research and teaching, I pursue both the pragmatic steps and the systemic transformations that can help us get there.  

I work toward manufacturing that makes two important things: products we need, and happy people.

Manufacturing gives us the products, infrastructure and technologies on which modern life depends. It creates economic value, meaningful work and capabilities that contribute to wellbeing throughout society. At the same time, manufacturing drives greenhouse gas emissions, resource consumption and environmental degradation. My overarching research question is therefore:听How can manufacturing continue to create essential value and human wellbeing while operating within planetary boundaries?

I approach this question from two complementary directions.

  • The first is pragmatic and industry-facing. I collaborate with manufacturing companies and other actors in electronics, machinery, healthcare, textiles and the built environment. Together, we investigate how circular business models, product-service systems, reverse logistics, reuse, remanufacturing and lifecycle-oriented design can improve resource efficiency, resilience and progress toward net zero.
  • The second direction is more fundamental. I examine whether circular economy strategies and efficiency improvements alone can achieve change at the scale required. My research explores how sufficiency, post-growth thinking and a stronger focus on human and societal wellbeing could change the purpose, organization and evaluation of manufacturing.

These directions belong together. Industry needs workable approaches that reduce environmental impacts now. It also needs a credible understanding of where those approaches should ultimately lead. My aim is to connect practical industrial transformation with the larger question of what manufacturing is for.

My academic background is in mechanical engineering and environmental technology and management. I am an Associate Professor and Head of the Product-Service Innovation Unit at Link枚ping University. Find my most recent publications on , and connect with me on .

Short summary

CV

  • Associate Professor in Environmental Technology and Management, Link枚ping University, Sweden, (2025-).
  • Assistant Professor in Environmental Technology and Management, Link枚ping University, Sweden, (2020-2025).
  • Postdoc in Environmental Technology and Management, Link枚ping University, Sweden, (2019-2020).
  • Ph.D. in Environmental Technology and Management, Link枚ping University, Sweden, (2014-2019).
  • M.Sc. studies in Lightweight Engineering Design, TU Chemnitz, Germany, (2012-2014).
  • Dipl.-Ing. (FH) in Mechanical Engineering, HTW Dresden, Germany (2008-2012).

Administrative positions

  • Head of Unit for Product-Service Innovation, Work Leader for 9+ staff (2023-)
  • Member of the Leadership Group of the Division of Environmental Technology and Management (2023-)
  • Member of the Program Planning Board for the Engineering Program Design and Product Development (2020-)

Awards

  • 2023 鈥 Project 鈥淩E:think 鈥 Rethink and improve product design and service cost for circular economy business models鈥, co-led by Johannes, was included in IVA鈥檚 100 list.
  • 2023 - Project 鈥淐ircular workwear in construction and industry鈥 was included on IVA鈥檚 100 list.

Teaching

  • TKMJ60 鈥 Product-Service Engineering for the Circular Economy, Course Designer and Examiner.
  • TKMJ46 鈥 Advanced Ecodesign, Examiner.
  • Supervisor and Examiner of Bachelor鈥檚 and Master鈥檚 theses in Design and Product Development, Energy-Environment-Management, and Industrial Engineering.

Dissemination

I strive to make the results of my research accessible to a broad audience. Examples:

  • Practitioner鈥檚 handbook to assess the value of offering products-as-a-service ().
  • Interview with journalist from Chefstidningen ()
  • Video detailing outcomes of the REES project ().
  • Video explaining the core insights of a paper on reducing variety when designing product-as-a-service published in Resources Conservation & Recycling.

Non-academic work

  • I have held workshops with practitioners and a large number of popular science talks.
  • Worked as a laboratory assistant, writer, and general jack-of-all-trades for the Fraunhofer Institute of Non-Destructive Testing and Fraunhofer Institute for Electronic Nano Systems (2009 鈥 2014).
  • 听Interned at Airbus A380 Customized Engineering, EADS, Hamburg. (2010 鈥 2011).
  • I also worked as a web-developer, waiter, IT-support representative for one of Germany鈥檚 largest consumer electronics retailers, Survey researcher for sociological studies at TU Dresden, line operator in an ice cream factory鈥

Publications

2026

Sofia Lingegard, Johannes Matschewsky, Thomas Budde Christensen, Nikoline Oturai, Kristian Syberg (2026) CAMBRIDGE PRISMS: PLASTICS, Vol. 4, Article e11 (Article in journal)

2025

Johannes Matschewsky (2025) Proceedings of EcoDesign 2025 International Symposium (Conference paper)
Johannes Matschewsky, Marianna Lena Kambanou, Tomohiko Sakao (2025) Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 219, Article 108261 (Article in journal)

2024

Johannes Matschewsky, Sofia Lingegard, Michael A. Martin (2024) 31ST CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, LCE 2024, p. 891-896 (Conference paper)
Johannes Matschewsky, Sofia Lingegard, Michael A. Martin (2024) 31ST CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, LCE 2024, p. 1095-1100 (Conference paper)

Research

From circular ambition to industrial transformation

Europe鈥檚 manufacturing industry must become climate-neutral, resource-efficient and resilient. My applied research supports this transformation by working directly with companies and value-chain actors to understand what prevents circular and net-zero ambitions from becoming everyday industrial practice.

A recurring theme in my work is the difference between adding circular activities and becoming genuinely circular. Manufacturers may introduce take-back systems, remanufacturing, service-based offerings or recycling while their underlying business models, product designs and incentives remain largely linear. These hybrid arrangements can create conflicts between product sales, product longevity, lifecycle responsibility and resource reduction.

My research examines how companies can move beyond isolated pilots and develop circular strategies that work across the product lifecycle. This includes:

  • establishing reverse logistics and take-back flows;
  • building capabilities for reuse, refurbishment and remanufacturing;
  • designing products and services for longer and more productive lifetimes;
  • developing circular business models and product-service systems;
  • managing product variety and lifecycle complexity;
  • using indicators and assessment methods to guide industrial change; and
  • identifying credible pathways toward net zero and greater resource resilience.

Current projects apply these questions in electronics, machinery, textiles and the construction and interior sector. One major focus is strengthening circular flows in the Swedish electronics industry through reuse, remanufacturing and recycling. Another concerns the implementation of reverse logistics with multinational manufacturers. I also investigate circularity and net-zero pathways in textiles and interiors, as well as the design and procurement of circular plastic products in healthcare.

My approach is collaborative and empirical. I work with companies and other stakeholders to analyse actual products, information flows, business models, organizational capabilities and value-chain relationships. The objective is not simply to describe why industrial transformation is difficult, but to develop practical methods, indicators and decision support that help organizations act.

Product-service systems and circular business models

Much of my earlier and continuing research concerns product-service systems, also known as integrated product-service offerings or product-as-a-service models. In these arrangements, manufacturers combine physical products with services and may retain responsibility for product performance throughout the lifecycle.

This can create incentives for durability, maintenance, upgrading, reuse and remanufacturing. However, service-based business models are not automatically circular or sustainable. Their environmental contribution depends on how products are designed, how the business model creates value, how products move between users, and whether additional resource consumption and rebound effects are avoided.

My work therefore examines product-service systems not as a sustainability solution in themselves, but as an industrial structure whose economic, operational and environmental outcomes must be carefully designed and evaluated. This foundation increasingly connects with my research on resource decoupling, circular customization, remanufacturing maturity and the transition from linear to circular manufacturing.

Manufacturing wellbeing: rethinking what industry is for

Circular economy research usually asks how industry can continue to create economic value while using fewer resources and generating less waste. That is an essential question, but it may not be sufficient.

Circular strategies have often produced efficiency improvements without demonstrating the absolute reduction in resource consumption required for manufacturing to operate within planetary boundaries. Companies may become more efficient per product or unit of economic value while total production and resource use continue to grow. Circular activities can also remain subordinate to linear business models and growth-oriented definitions of success.

My research therefore asks a more fundamental question: What if human and societal wellbeing were not treated as side-effects of successful manufacturing, but as its central purpose?

Manufacturing already contributes profoundly to wellbeing. It provides necessary products, livelihoods, skills, economic security, and social value. Yet these benefits are usually evaluated separately from manufacturing鈥檚 environmental impacts, and success remains dominated by measures of growth, output and profitability.
A wellbeing-centered perspective would ask what products and services people and society actually need, how they can be provided within ecological limits, what constitutes meaningful and equitable work, and how industrial activity affects workers, communities, stakeholders and societal resilience.

This connects my research to sufficiency, post-growth and degrowth, as well as to debates about circular economy, resource decoupling and the purpose of the firm. Sufficiency is particularly important because it shifts attention from producing more efficiently to meeting human needs with appropriate levels of material and energy use. It invites manufacturers to consider not only how products are made, but which products should exist, how much is enough, how long products should last, and how value can be created without continually increasing material throughput.

The aim is neither to romanticize manufacturing nor to reject practical industrial progress. It is to connect engineering and industrial transformation more directly to their ultimate purpose: enabling people and societies to live well within the means of the planet.

Products and services in a competitive world

Combined offerings of products and services (Product-Service Systems, PSS) are important in our day for several reasons: In an ever faster moving world, only selling a physical object is not enough anymore.

Imagine your smartphone without the app store. It would just be an empty shell, waiting to be filled. The same is true in the larger engineering companies that I focus on in my work. Logistics companies do not want to buy a forklift truck any more, they want to be sure that the truck is ready to go whenever needed, that there is the right number of trucks available at any time, that repair happens fast and without them noticing. Only companies that can provide these kinds of services can survive on the very competitive markets of today, and I want to support the companies I work with in mastering this challenge.听

Tackling challenges, finding solutions

If we want to succeed in having a flourishing business world and maintaining our natural resources, we have to aim for a circular economy. Everyone consumer knows car sharing, but even companies are increasingly looking towards services to make their operations more effective. In my research, I aim to understand what makes companies succeed on this path we call 鈥榮ervitization鈥, and what challenges they meet along the way. Getting to grips with this is key, so that we as academics can recommend strategies for the design and operation of these product-service offerings that ensure they are good for the company providing them, for the customer buying them, and, at scale, for everyone on the planet.

Customer 鈥 Provider 鈥 Environment

Ensuring that all parties involved in a business transaction (Customer, Provider, and Environment) benefit from it is no easy feat. By working with large Swedish and international companies, I want to find out what makes them successful on their path towards becoming a service provider, and where they have room to improve, particularly when it comes to how they design and operate their product-service offerings. Of course, I also try to support their success by disseminating knowledge and identifying best practices. My ultimate measure of success would be, through my academic work and the work with industry, to contribute to us actually achieving a balance between service-customers, -providers and the environment that can support us towards a more sustainable future.

Research areas and projects

Research Areas

  • Sustainable manufacturing
  • Circular economy and circular business models for manufacturing
  • Net-zero industry
  • Reverse logistics and take-back systems for reuse and remanufacturing
  • Reuse, refurbishment and remanufacturing
  • Product-service systems and product-as-a-service design
  • Lifecycle engineering and design
  • Resource efficiency and resource decoupling
  • Circularity indicators and maturity assessment
  • Sufficiency in business and manufacturing as a route to meeting needs within planetary boundaries
  • Wellbeing as a core purpose of manufacturing
  • Post-growth and degrowth
  • Planetary boundaries
  • Industrial resilience
  • Electronics, machinery, healthcare, textiles, the built environment, 鈥

Resarch Projects

Current

  • ReLoop Electronics 鈥 Strategies for the Swedish Electronics Industry toward Resource Efficiency and Resilience through Reuse, Remanufacturing, and Recycling. Financed by Energimyndigheten (Swedish Energy Agency) through the Net-Zero Industry program. Research led by LiU (I am the project manager), the entire project is led by Svensk Elektronik. 2025 鈥 2028.
  • NETRACCI 鈥 NETzero TRAnsition framework for Circular Construction and Interior. Financed by Vinnova (Swedish Innovation Agency) through the Net-Zero Industry program. Led by Matters Group in collaboration with LiU (I lead), RISE, and KTH. 2025-2027.
  • Back2Back 鈥 A Cross-Industrial Take-Back Infrastructure for Repair, Reuse, and Remanufacturing. Financed by TRACE Solutions (Innovation Fund Denmark). 2025-2026.
  • TranscCoDe - Transforming Circularity through Co-Design. Financed by Vinnova through an Eureka EU Financing Scheme. Led by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in collaboration with LiU, DTU (Denmark), Fraunhofer Austria (Austria) and 13 companies. 2026 鈥 2029.

Past

  • Re:think 鈥 Rethink and improve product design and service cost for circular economy business models. Co-project leader. Financed by Energimyndigheten (Re:Source). 2022-2025.
  • Adapt2030 鈥 Adaptive lifecycle design by applying digitalization and AI techniques to production. Financed by Vinnova (Produktion2030). 2020-2023.
  • Resource-efficient and effective solutions (REES Phase 2). Financed by Mistra. 2019-2023.
  • Circular workwear in construction and industry. Financed by Vinnova (Re:Source). 2021-2023.
  • Applying recommendations from the lifecycle perspective to on-going R&D projects. Financed by Toyota Material Handling. 2019-2021.
  • Analysis of Lifecycle Costs and Values to Improve Lifecycle Management. Financed by Toyota Material Handling. 2014-2018.
  • KEAP - Design for remanufacturing through effective use of product lifecycle data. Financed by Vinnova. 2013 鈥 2016.

Teaching

Student centric and cutting edge

A mechanical engineer by education, I try to open the eyes of students studying in engineering- and environmental disciplines to the technical, environmental and economic challenges we are facing, and support them in acquiring the knowledge and tools to solve these challenges in their future working life. 

My teaching activities are centered on EcoDesign and Product-Service Systems (Integrated Product-Service Offerings).听I aim for an interactive and engaging teaching style that is focused on co-creating relevant knowledge and skills with students using recent research in terms of content and didactics.

I am most active in planning and teaching both lectures and the project in the course TKMJ32 (Integrated Product-Service Engineering), while I also hold lectures and exercises in TKMJ46 (EcoDesign, in Swedish) and other related courses. I have supervised a number of bachelor and master theses and I occasionally discuss my work and its goals as an inspirational speaker, e.g. in fall of 2016 for high school students at Berzeliusskolan in Link枚ping.听

Coworkers

News

Organisation